Why do people always make a big deal about ADMU and DLSU? Why do they put a boundary against these two?
Ateneo de Manila University as well as De La Salle University have been dual of a many largest as well as excellent universities in a Philippines(Manila). They both surpass in opposite aspects, as well as they know where they’re great at. Most of a people say, if you’re formulation to take law, it’s a featured item of Ateneo. And if we wish to take up commercial operation courses, La Salle is great during it. In conditions of basketball, both teams have been mostly judged as well as criticized by a public. They do not know which they’re putting a larger range in between these two. So, we wish to know because they regularly put a large understanding of out of it. And what interests me many is a actuality that, because usually these dual universities get concerned each time when it comes to showing off as well as stuffs?
benj said,
Wrote on January 26, 2010 @ 1:53 am
there are only appear in manila… there are so many universities in the province excel most compare in these schools…. i think there is no such things to put boundaries…
they did’nt deserve it being a contreversial one…..or such a good school…..
BeejBeej said,
Wrote on January 28, 2010 @ 5:55 am
I think its a little telling of how the sphere of influence centers on certain classes in the Philippines.
The Students of The Ateneo and Lasalle are comprised mostly of people from the upper income bracket of society, and it would be pretty safe to say that their parents too belong to the same bracket.
Since they come from more or less the same socioeconomic backgrounds, then these students would more or less be fighting for the same jobs or be fighting for prestige in more or less the same fields. And I guess this is why people often find the need to look at things, correctly or not, as “Blue” vs. “Green”.
If this “big deal” thing is in reference to basketball, I don’t get it either. We Filipino’s are crazy about basketball though. But I think we also tend to think that a game or singular event answers questions whose answers are infinitely more complex.